<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are Soft VoIP Clients Obsolete?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.voip-sol.com/are-soft-voip-clients-obsolete/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.voip-sol.com/are-soft-voip-clients-obsolete/</link>
	<description>VoIP News and Information</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 13:06:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: accelzone - techie weblog &#187; Let The Embedding (of VoIP) Begin</title>
		<link>http://www.voip-sol.com/are-soft-voip-clients-obsolete/comment-page-1/#comment-161</link>
		<dc:creator>accelzone - techie weblog &#187; Let The Embedding (of VoIP) Begin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2006 02:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.voip-sol.com/are-soft-voip-clients-obsolete/#comment-161</guid>
		<description>[...] Nevertheless, while I may not like that Adobe bought out Macromedia, it&#8217;s an interesting idea and I wish them luck with the Flash-VoIP features. It could certainly be useful for live help sites that want to add VoIPability. [Note: After I wrote this low-key diatribe, I read Tom&#8217;s piece, which says the Flash player has already had VoIP capability since early 2002. That&#8217;s a surprise to me, but I still maintain my jaded opinion.] On the other hand, click-to-call types of embedded VoIP applications just might make soft VoIP clients obsolete. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Nevertheless, while I may not like that Adobe bought out Macromedia, it&#8217;s an interesting idea and I wish them luck with the Flash-VoIP features. It could certainly be useful for live help sites that want to add VoIPability. [Note: After I wrote this low-key diatribe, I read Tom&#8217;s piece, which says the Flash player has already had VoIP capability since early 2002. That&#8217;s a surprise to me, but I still maintain my jaded opinion.] On the other hand, click-to-call types of embedded VoIP applications just might make soft VoIP clients obsolete. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VOIP Guide - How VoIP Works? &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Let The Embedding (of VoIP) Begin</title>
		<link>http://www.voip-sol.com/are-soft-voip-clients-obsolete/comment-page-1/#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator>VOIP Guide - How VoIP Works? &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Let The Embedding (of VoIP) Begin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2006 02:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.voip-sol.com/are-soft-voip-clients-obsolete/#comment-160</guid>
		<description>[...] Nevertheless, while I may not like that Adobe bought out Macromedia, it&#8217;s an interesting idea and I wish them luck with the Flash-VoIP features. It could certainly be useful for live help sites that want to add VoIPability. [Note: After I wrote this low-key diatribe, I read Tom&#8217;s piece, which says the Flash player has already had VoIP capability since early 2002. That&#8217;s a surprise to me, but I still maintain my jaded opinion.] On the other hand, click-to-call types of embedded VoIP applications just might make soft VoIP clients obsolete. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Nevertheless, while I may not like that Adobe bought out Macromedia, it&#8217;s an interesting idea and I wish them luck with the Flash-VoIP features. It could certainly be useful for live help sites that want to add VoIPability. [Note: After I wrote this low-key diatribe, I read Tom&#8217;s piece, which says the Flash player has already had VoIP capability since early 2002. That&#8217;s a surprise to me, but I still maintain my jaded opinion.] On the other hand, click-to-call types of embedded VoIP applications just might make soft VoIP clients obsolete. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
